Skip to content
The 100% CI

The 100% CI

Always confident. Sometimes credible.
  • Archive
  • About
  • Blog Roll
  • Privacy Policy
Multiverse Brain Meme

Mülltiverse Analysis

March 7, 2021 Julia Rohrer 2 Comments

Minor update, February 4, 2026: In the meantime, Jessica Hullman, Andrew Gelman and I have posted a manuscript titled “What’s…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Statistics, Teaching Filed under: multiverse analysis, robustness checks

On the origin of psychological research practices, with special regard to self-reported nostril width

July 31, 2020 Julia Rohrer 5 Comments

The longer I have been in psychological research, the more I wonder about why we do things the way we…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Statistics, Teaching

The first rule of appealing editors’ publication decisions: nobody talks about appealing editors’ publication decisions

July 3, 2020 Leonid Tiokhin 1 Comment

To round off an eventful week at The 100% CI — after a series of posts on a Red-Team Challenge…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Uncategorized
Negative criticism

The Red Team Challenge (Part 3): Is it Feasible in Practice?

July 1, 2020 Daniël Lakens and Leonid Tiokhin 1 Comment

Also read Part 1 and Part 2 in this series on our Red Team Challenge. Six weeks ago, we launched…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Crosspost, Error culture Filed under: bug bounty, mistakes, peer review, red team
An owl

The Red Team Challenge (Part 2): The Arbiter’s View

June 30, 2020 Ruben Arslan 1 Comment

This post is second in a series. The first part is Why I placed a bounty on my own research,…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Crosspost, Error culture Filed under: bug bounty, error culture, mistakes, peer review, red team
Red Team Nicholas

The Red Team Challenge (Part 1): Why I placed a bounty on my own research

June 29, 2020 Nicholas Coles 28 Comments

A few months ago, I put a $3,000 bounty on my own research.  In a Red Team Challenge, my collaborators…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Crosspost, Error culture Filed under: bug bounty, mistakes, peer review, red team
Mis-allocated scrutiny

Mis-allocated scrutiny

June 24, 2020 Ruben Arslan Leave a comment

In the current system of pre-publication peer review, which papers are scrutinized most thoroughly? In this blog post, I argue…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Crosspost, Metrics, R

Crisis research, fast and slow

March 26, 2020 Anne Scheel 3 Comments

TL;DR: Anne wrote a blog post for the first time in over 2 years. The situation must be quite serious…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Uncategorized
Header saying "Advances in Calendar 2019" with a calendar for 2019 and galaxy brain

Decision Letter for 2019

December 31, 2019 The Reviewers Leave a comment

Dear Dr The 100% CI: Thank you for submitting “2019” [CAL-2019-12] to Advances in Calendar. I was very fortunate to…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Uncategorized

Sequential testing, replication, and the unconscious

November 6, 2019 Pieter Moors and Tom Heyman Leave a comment

Today we are hosting a guest blog by Pieter and Tom, who tell us about their round-shaped and spiky experiences working…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Uncategorized

Post navigation

Page 4 of 7
← Previous 1 … 3 4 5 … 7 Next →

Put us in your Feedreader

  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS

Recent Posts

  • My Immortal Time Bias
  • Reviewer notes: Odds ratios are really odd
  • Friends don’t let friends run moderated cross-country regressions
  • Science needs downvotes
  • Think inside the box, part 1: The guy Euclidean distance told you not to worry about

Recent Comments

  • Luciano on My Immortal Time Bias
  • Julia Rohrer on My Immortal Time Bias
  • Luciano on My Immortal Time Bias
  • Links 8/9/26 | Mike the Mad Biologist on Reviewer notes: Odds ratios are really odd
  • Alejandro Rujano on Econ Envy
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2026 The 100% CI — Primer WordPress theme by GoDaddy