Skip to content
The 100% CI

The 100% CI

Always confident. Sometimes credible.
  • Archive
  • About
  • Blog Roll
  • Privacy Policy

Against public engagement

July 8, 2021 Anne Scheel

Estimated reading time: 8-10 minutes To get the boring stuff out of the way: Of course I’m not against scientists…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Uncategorized
Multiverse Brain Meme

Mülltiverse Analysis

March 7, 2021 Julia Rohrer 1 Comment

Psychologists like their analyses like I like my coffee: robusta. Results shouldn’t change too much, no matter which exclusion criteria…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Statistics, Teaching Filed under: multiverse analysis, robustness checks

On the origin of psychological research practices, with special regard to self-reported nostril width

July 31, 2020 Julia Rohrer 5 Comments

The longer I have been in psychological research, the more I wonder about why we do things the way we…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Statistics, Teaching

The first rule of appealing editors’ publication decisions: nobody talks about appealing editors’ publication decisions

July 3, 2020 Leonid Tiokhin 1 Comment

To round off an eventful week at The 100% CI — after a series of posts on a Red-Team Challenge…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Uncategorized
Negative criticism

The Red Team Challenge (Part 3): Is it Feasible in Practice?

July 1, 2020 Daniël Lakens and Leonid Tiokhin 1 Comment

Also read Part 1 and Part 2 in this series on our Red Team Challenge. Six weeks ago, we launched…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Crosspost, Error culture Filed under: bug bounty, mistakes, peer review, red team
An owl

The Red Team Challenge (Part 2): The Arbiter’s View

June 30, 2020 Ruben Arslan 1 Comment

This post is second in a series. The first part is Why I placed a bounty on my own research,…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Crosspost, Error culture Filed under: bug bounty, error culture, mistakes, peer review, red team
Red Team Nicholas

The Red Team Challenge (Part 1): Why I placed a bounty on my own research

June 29, 2020 Nicholas Coles 28 Comments

A few months ago, I put a $3,000 bounty on my own research.  In a Red Team Challenge, my collaborators…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Crosspost, Error culture Filed under: bug bounty, mistakes, peer review, red team
Mis-allocated scrutiny

Mis-allocated scrutiny

June 24, 2020 Ruben Arslan

In the current system of pre-publication peer review, which papers are scrutinized most thoroughly? In this blog post, I argue…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Crosspost, Metrics, R

Crisis research, fast and slow

March 26, 2020 Anne Scheel 3 Comments

TL;DR: Anne wrote a blog post for the first time in over 2 years. The situation must be quite serious…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Uncategorized
Header saying "Advances in Calendar 2019" with a calendar for 2019 and galaxy brain

Decision Letter for 2019

December 31, 2019 The Reviewers

Dear Dr The 100% CI: Thank you for submitting “2019” [CAL-2019-12] to Advances in Calendar. I was very fortunate to…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Uncategorized

Post navigation

Page 3 of 6
← Previous 1 2 3 4 … 6 Next →

Put us in your Feedreader

  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS

Recent Posts

  • Reviewer notes: That’s a very nice mediation analysis you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.
  • Controlling for careless responding requires causal justification
  • Reviewer notes: Avoid any ambiguity about analysis aims
  • Reviewer notes: In a randomized experiment, the pre-post differences are not effect estimates
  • The Untold Mystery of Rogue RA

Recent Comments

  • Julia Rohrer on Reviewer notes: That’s a very nice mediation analysis you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.
  • Dev psych on Reviewer notes: That’s a very nice mediation analysis you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.
  • Julia Rohrer on Reviewer notes: That’s a very nice mediation analysis you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.
  • Klaus Pforr on Reviewer notes: That’s a very nice mediation analysis you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.
  • Julia Rohrer on Reviewer notes: That’s a very nice mediation analysis you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2025 The 100% CI — Primer WordPress theme by GoDaddy