Skip to content
The 100% CI
The 100% CI
Always confident. Sometimes credible.
  • Archive
  • About
  • Blog Roll
  • Privacy Policy

Tag: peer review

Inspirational quote: A goal is not always meant to be reached, it often serves simply as something to aim at. Bruce Lee (or maybe somebody else)

Reviewer notes: Avoid any ambiguity about analysis aims

February 17, 2025 Julia Rohrer

For any central statistical analysis that you report in your manuscript, it should be absolutely clear for readers why the…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Causal inference, Reviewer notes, Teaching Filed under: peer review
Funny Bunny/Lotti Karotti

The Hare-Brained Generation: Teen mental health crisis or lacklustre record keeping?

December 10, 2024 Ruben Arslan

In The Anxious Generation, Jon Haidt argues that social media is driving a mental health crisis among teens. It’s a…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Causal inference, Error culture, Measurement Filed under: error culture, mistakes, peer review, social media
Negative criticism

The Red Team Challenge (Part 3): Is it Feasible in Practice?

July 1, 2020 Daniël Lakens and Leonid Tiokhin 1 Comment

Also read Part 1 and Part 2 in this series on our Red Team Challenge. Six weeks ago, we launched…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Crosspost, Error culture Filed under: bug bounty, mistakes, peer review, red team
An owl

The Red Team Challenge (Part 2): The Arbiter’s View

June 30, 2020 Ruben Arslan 1 Comment

This post is second in a series. The first part is Why I placed a bounty on my own research,…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Crosspost, Error culture Filed under: bug bounty, error culture, mistakes, peer review, red team
Red Team Nicholas

The Red Team Challenge (Part 1): Why I placed a bounty on my own research

June 29, 2020 Nicholas Coles 28 Comments

A few months ago, I put a $3,000 bounty on my own research.  In a Red Team Challenge, my collaborators…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Crosspost, Error culture Filed under: bug bounty, mistakes, peer review, red team

Put us in your Feedreader

  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS

Recent Posts

  • Reviewer notes: That’s a very nice mediation analysis you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.
  • Controlling for careless responding requires causal justification
  • Reviewer notes: Avoid any ambiguity about analysis aims
  • Reviewer notes: In a randomized experiment, the pre-post differences are not effect estimates
  • The Untold Mystery of Rogue RA

Recent Comments

  • Julia Rohrer on Reviewer notes: That’s a very nice mediation analysis you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.
  • Dev psych on Reviewer notes: That’s a very nice mediation analysis you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.
  • Julia Rohrer on Reviewer notes: That’s a very nice mediation analysis you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.
  • Klaus Pforr on Reviewer notes: That’s a very nice mediation analysis you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.
  • Julia Rohrer on Reviewer notes: That’s a very nice mediation analysis you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2025 The 100% CI — Primer WordPress theme by GoDaddy