Skip to content
The 100% CI
The 100% CI
Always confident. Sometimes credible.
  • Archive
  • About
  • Blog Roll
  • Privacy Policy

Category: Error culture

Funny Bunny/Lotti Karotti

The Hare-Brained Generation: Teen mental health crisis or lacklustre record keeping?

December 10, 2024 Ruben Arslan

In The Anxious Generation, Jon Haidt argues that social media is driving a mental health crisis among teens. It’s a…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Causal inference, Error culture, Measurement Filed under: error culture, mistakes, peer review, social media
A treemap of how widely reused psychological measures are.

Oooh baby, rescue me from the jingle jangle jungle

March 22, 2024 Ruben Arslan

Recently, Malte, Taym, Ian and I wrote a short commentary paper on the toothbrush problem for measures in psychology: Everybody…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Error culture, Measurement, Metrics
Negative criticism

The Red Team Challenge (Part 3): Is it Feasible in Practice?

July 1, 2020 Daniël Lakens and Leonid Tiokhin 1 Comment

Also read Part 1 and Part 2 in this series on our Red Team Challenge. Six weeks ago, we launched…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Crosspost, Error culture Filed under: bug bounty, mistakes, peer review, red team
An owl

The Red Team Challenge (Part 2): The Arbiter’s View

June 30, 2020 Ruben Arslan 1 Comment

This post is second in a series. The first part is Why I placed a bounty on my own research,…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Crosspost, Error culture Filed under: bug bounty, error culture, mistakes, peer review, red team
Red Team Nicholas

The Red Team Challenge (Part 1): Why I placed a bounty on my own research

June 29, 2020 Nicholas Coles 28 Comments

A few months ago, I put a $3,000 bounty on my own research.  In a Red Team Challenge, my collaborators…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Crosspost, Error culture Filed under: bug bounty, mistakes, peer review, red team

Put us in your Feedreader

  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS

Recent Posts

  • Reviewer notes: That’s a very nice mediation analysis you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.
  • Controlling for careless responding requires causal justification
  • Reviewer notes: Avoid any ambiguity about analysis aims
  • Reviewer notes: In a randomized experiment, the pre-post differences are not effect estimates
  • The Untold Mystery of Rogue RA

Recent Comments

  • Julia Rohrer on Reviewer notes: That’s a very nice mediation analysis you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.
  • Dev psych on Reviewer notes: That’s a very nice mediation analysis you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.
  • Julia Rohrer on Reviewer notes: That’s a very nice mediation analysis you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.
  • Klaus Pforr on Reviewer notes: That’s a very nice mediation analysis you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.
  • Julia Rohrer on Reviewer notes: That’s a very nice mediation analysis you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2025 The 100% CI — Primer WordPress theme by GoDaddy